The big screen mobile phone is rampant, the mobile phone film is promoted in the market, but these hot-selling film is actually effective, I have been very curious, this time I finally got a determination, I purchased the equipment and 17 different brands of film, once The horizontal big evaluation. The evaluation has collected a large number of data from the center of the mobile phone film, the edge pressure, appearance, work, prices, etc., give detailed score and evaluation. I hope that through this small science and evaluation, it is helpful to read this article. (There is no patience, you can directly jump to the article, finally see the score and sorted)
Type of mobile phone film
What is the time to start the mobile phone film? I think it should be that the screen of the mobile phone is getting bigger and bigger, and the price of the mobile phone is getting more and more expensive. The larger the screen represents a larger contact area, so the probability of scratching is also greatly improved. On the other hand, the popularity of smartphones, letting this form of mobile phones in this form of mobile phones, more and more people in the film.
When the epidemic film was first started, there was no normal plastic film. Although this PTE film played the role of the protection screen, but dry feel and very easy to wear the characteristics, so that this film is unexpected I often have a few a few, and I am also a normally, I am a forced disorder, and my film is pursuitless, so each film is also a baptism for me.
Tempered glass film
The tempered glass has a relatively good wear resistance, and very hard, its Vickers hardness reaches 6 to 7 between. The tempered glass is actually a pre-stress glass, in order to improve the strength of the glass, usually used chemical or physical methods, forming a pressure stress in the glass surface, first counteracting the surface stress, thereby improving the load capacity, enhancing glass itself Wind pressure, heat, impact, etc. The tempered glass protective film is protected for a higher level of safety on the screen. The glass film itself is much better than the plastic film, and since the tempered film is a hard film, the automatic exhaust effect is good, the film is simpler.
Here I have to mention the watercreated film of many people in the past few years, the name is really nice, giving people a perfect feeling. The claim can be perfectly bonded with the mobile phone regardless of whether you are a curved screen. However, the essence of this film is to stick another plastic film on your phone, and the hand feeling of plastic is absolutely less than glasses. The hydroagulant film is one of the plastic film, but the texture is better than conventional plastic films, and the fit performance is better. In the past, some products were pasted and needed, and now a lot of hydroagulant, there is no need for this step, so there is nothing to do with the water. However, the hydrocoagulant, the texture is very soft, the actual use is usually a few scratches and pits, don’t believe that the seller will repair itself, if you are so advanced, the mobile phone manufacturer is directly used. This kind of film is strongly referred to! I don’t recommend it! Not recommended
The following is the daily wrinkle of the hydrocoagulant:
A mobile phone film that has recently been popular, is a relatively large feature that it is necessary to bond the film by ultraviolet light. The essence of this film is the adhesive layer of the original and mobile phone, which is changed to ultraviolet glue. If you are not familiar with this glue, we can simply think that it is a high transmimed glue, which can be quickly cured under the irradiation of ultraviolet rays. So by dropping glue on the screen, putting the film, emptying the air, and the ultraviolet light can be completed smoothly. The finished product is good, the edge is slippery, the surface screen, the disadvantage is that the removal is not as convenient as ordinary tempered film, the ordinary film is directly torn, and this film needs to be more cleaner and cleaner Post, the entry is difficult.
If you ask my film, I personally think that if you are more attractive to the scratch problem of the screen, I suggest you film. Of course, we are not the earliest plastic film, because the hardness of the plastic film is not as good as the original glass film of the mobile phone, this is tantamount to hiding the stone into the watermelon, and then saying that it hopes to protect the stone with a hard shell with watermelon. Meaningless.
Thickness of the film
Various thicknesses such as glass film, with 0.1 / 0.15 / 0.2 / 0.33 / 0.4mm, the less natural thickness, the better, this is some people like to use 001, although it is more expensive. However, when the thin feels, it is also accompanied by risks, as if it is easy to break, 0.1mm film compression capacity is poor, easier to break. The 003 thicker but safer, the 0.33mm film is thicker, but the strength will have better improvement. Some people may talk to the toughness of the tempering, with the folding test, in fact, this significance is not large, because the actual use will not encounter such a scene, and the thinner film is easier, then the overall pressure resistance is reduced.
Of course, the various thickness of the various thickness here has not calculated the thickness of its adhesive, and the adhesive also increases the thickness of about 0.2 mm to the tempered film.
Surface hardness of the film
I don’t know if you are buying a film in Taobao. Then I will tell you now, don’t be confused, there is no reference significance at all, 7h, 9h, 9h is used by the hardness standard of the pencil, yes, you didn’t see the wrong pencil, 2h, 3h, etc. I sincerely admire such a marketing genius to put the hardness of the pencil and Moh’s hardness to change the concept, so that everyone feels particularly hard.
If you look at the monkete hardness table, you can see that the hardness of the ordinary glass is not more than 7, even if the gorilla screen used by Apple’s original screen, its Mo’s hardness is only between 6-7. what does this mean? The gravel repeatedly rubbed the surface of the mobile phone, it produces a detailed scratch, so those films nominally these 9h hardness, it is indeed harder than 9h, but even the pencils of 9h can be easily removed by a pen knife and a knife. Sharper …
Didn’t find a Chinese picture, the 5h pencil corresponding to the following figure is about 5 or so, and the Moh’s hardness of the tempered glass is generally 6-7, that is, if a mobile phone steel film can not reach 9h, that is really There is a problem.
In order to prove that 9h hardness is said nonsense, I deliberately take out the tungsten bricks that I usually make a hole in the fingers, and gently scribble in the surface of the tempered glass, and a clear permanent scratch is completed. If you need reference, the Moh’s hardness of the tungsten steel is 9-9.5 compared with the tempered film high 2.5 levels, I am going to prepare for my wife’s diamond, and I am giving up after being played.
I don’t know when the dimension of the film exceeds the universe we cognracted, from the beginning of 2.5D, to the later 3D, then buy a film every other period of time, it will find that the number before this is increased. It’s a look at the science fiction. When I opened Taobao, I have been upgraded to 10D … I can only sigh, my dimension is too low, I can’t understand the 10-dimensional film manufacturing of high-dimensional biodies.
Said so much, the true film edge I think there are only three kinds, the flowers are not used by the whistle, directly ask the seller which kind of one.
It is the edge that does not do any cutting processing. If the following picture is a right angle, this film is the cheapest, but the biggest shortcoming is that it is 手, now it is basically not seen.
This film is an upgrade for the planar film, which is a chamfer that is not bonded to the edge of the surface, making this angle become arc, so it can greatly enhance the feel. This film is obviously enough in the iPhone4-5 era. Because the phone screen is pure plane. But one thing to note, some film treatment is not good, near the button and the corresponding right angle near the handset, the result is still inseparable.
: As shown in this film is mainly targeted by iPhone6, the screen of the mobile phone screen edge curved application scenario. By processing the edge position of the tempered film, a problem that can be combined with the edge of the phone arcuate screen can be solved. The curved angle treatment here usually has four methods, which are hot bending, cold carving, etching treatment, and drops.
Among them, the thermal bending process is to bend the film with a hot bending machine, but there is also a disadvantage that the stability is poor, but the internal stress of the film is high, but the production efficiency is high, so many manufacturers are now used.
The cold carving process is carved directly with CNC, dig off the plan glass, so that the exterior generates radians, but the production efficiency is relatively low, and the specific cost should see the overall shipments of the manufacturer, and the goods must be high.
There is very little on the surface of the etching process, in fact, in fact, with chemical liquid (hydrofluoric acid), the mold is made of the planar tempered film to form a groove, and then carved with CNC.
The last one is a dropped process, and the wisdom of the Chinese people in the manufacturing of the steel film is really endless. That is to form an arc from the edge of the plate. Exactly, this is not a real one 3D film …
It should be noted that many promotion on the market is this shape of mobile phone, or a 5D, 6D or even 7D mobile phone film is not necessarily a curved shape, but is only ordinary 2.5D. However, even the real 3D curved film, but due to the influence of the AB film base material, it cannot complete the arc, so it will be black, to avoid visually shortcomings, but the truth of the 3D film Will be smaller than 2.5D.
Finally, I don’t believe that there is currently any of the steel films to do the film effect in the picture below. If there is, that is, I am too poor.
Please see this contrast below, the above is a pseudo-arc film, there is a clear gap, and the following is a 3D arc film, although it is not possible to make the above effect map, but the gap is significantly reduced
Glass is mainly divided into two major categories, sodium calcium glass and aluminum glass.
When you look at the side, you will notice that the color of the glass is different, and the calcium glass is a faint green, while the aluminum silicon glass is substantially white. AGC Asahi is calcium glass, in general, the film sold in the Internet will be specially marked, and some brands will be particularly famous to high aluminum glass. Most of the cases are not specifically indicated. It is very likely to be ordinary. Domestic aluminum silica glass, or calcium glass. Since it is difficult to test, unless I can determine, it is not particularly specified that the glass type is specifically indicated.
Test method and equipment for tempered film
The usual tempered glass film is used as a falling ball test. It is simple to drop a steel ball to a certain height, and it is unqualified. This experiment has a problem to quantify but not qualitative. It is more difficult to compare, which is inspired by a big god of the millet forum, tested in a similar method, and the light experimental equipment took me a few hundred. He mentioned that the price of Apple tempered film is generally more expensive than the Androi machine. It may be better to use, so I can’t help but also make an apple tempered film horizontal assessment.
The equipment is purchased, a domestic pressure gauge, the itinerary 30kg / 300n, there is peak mode, and the maximum value can be recorded, which is ideal for this experiment.
Since the test requires a fixed base and a gantry, a gantry is also purchased vertically vertically on top, stable vertical pressure until the film is broken.
Since the film closer entity can cause the attachment to the test, the pressure point is suspended here, and the pressure resistance of the film body can be determined separately, and a acrylic block has been made in the position of the overtight head. Leave a hole to test the tempered film. At the edge test, the pressure drill bit is just around 3 mm near the edge of the film.
The final test state is as shown above.
It is especially emphasized here that the test is not determined to determine the absolute compressive number of the steel film, but under the fixed experimental method and conditions, test my relative pressure that I purchased the 17 steel film, which is convenient Sort score. The experiment is affected by the batch model of the steel film, only for your reference, help.
The assessment of a film is mainly composed of several below:
, I will test the floating strength of the membrane here, not behind it, because it really can’t be broken. Such a test is intended to obtain a relatively quantitative data to the intensity of the monolithic membrane itself, and sorted the strength sequence of the film selected. Although the measured data is an absolute value, it should only be sorted under a specific device specific measurement method I use. The test method is to take the center position of the membrane three points to the flush pressure strength, then take 3 points, test the edge pressure strength, respectively. 50 points, 50 points, 20 points, edge, use sort, weighted score. The center scratch formula is the average maximum force / all membrane of the film * 21, the highest no more than 30 points, the edge of the average edge of the film is divided into the maximum force / all membranes edge force average * 14, the highest does not exceed 20. Then, based on the thickness + additional points, 0.33mm 0 points, 0.2mm +3.5, 0.15mm + 7 points.
The edge post of the membrane: Although many film knows that it has 9D-10D but the actual test is not in line with the real situation, whether there is a significant bending treatment for the edge, whether it is a true 3D film, there will be a discussion here. . Total 10 points, objective facts and subjective scores.
The feel of the film contains the coating layer, and the overall feel. The good film has an oleinated oil layer, which is not easy to attach to fingerprint, here will be subjectively experienced. And use oily pen to dry 2 minutes after wipe the test, total 10 points, experiments and subjective scores.
The beauty of the film, the edge of the edge, the nearby microphone, the reservation of the camera position will affect the beauty of the film, here will also score, total 10 points, subjective rating
The thinness of the membrane also directly affects the top hand and aesthetic score, and independently lists 10 points, the higher the thin score.
The details of the film, according to the details of the work, 5 points, subjective evaluation
The film price is scored, the less cheaper, the less the film has a black side, some don’t, the unified style will be uniformly calculated after the stylit * 1.1, the formula is 10 / membrane priced after the opening * 8 * 0.5, if the result is greater than 5, it is no more than 5 points.
This time, there are 17 different brands of iPhone X / XS Max, 4 of which are non-branded membranes, and others basically select Taobao sales ranking 10-30 yuan in the film brand, the biggest sales Connection. The following evaluation sequences have no special reasons, only which packaging I will attract it first, and there is no relationship with the brand.
Choosing Bun Ke Shiyi seems to have a very high model, V PRO +
The protective film housing uses the shining golden and silver color, and the cover is also labeled with 3D cutting molding on the cover.
The membrane packaging is relatively luxurious, and the packaged cardboard can be used as a film artifact. There is a special dust cover near the microphone of the membrane, and it is very advanced.
The film is true 3d, which can be observed by the following figure. The edges have obvious curved and there is no AB glue. This may be the best one I have learned in these membranes. When the price is not too suitable, about more than 30, the surface coating treatment is very comfortable, and it is easy to wipe the oil.
Originally giving this film, the final test result is not very ideal, combined with its low price, ranking backwards. However, this film is inertile in various small details, except for prices and more docong of compressive pressure, there is no excessive shortcomings, and the ranking is a score rule.
The thing is really quite expensive, so I specially pick a non-full screen to test (saving money), but the arc is the biggest side of the cuts, is happy, feels unusual, and clear 3D arc side. The glass used is the sodium calcium glass of AGC.
The accessories of the cord are also very simple, dust removal and cleaning film sets. The result of the final test is whether the compressive ability is unexpected, and the central pressure resistance is almost in the upper limit of the device. However, due to the relationship between the major arc, the partial strength is affected, and a portion of the score is deducted.
UGreen Green United
Green United has been really doing, charging lines, charging treasure, charging head, these new things they also do, their products have characteristics, want you to say that it is especially good, but you can’t praise it, but But the people are more satisfied, and there is no big problem.
The film provides a film artifact, which can be more accurately diaphragm. It is worth noting that the green-coupled film is also a very clear concave structure of the real 3D arc, but unfortunately the rubber layer is too thick, causing the arc to be perfectly covered, but it is strong than those of those pseudo 3D. A lot. To say the shortcomings of this film, I can only spit too thick, the original 0.33mm glass, with a very thick AB rubber layer, total thickness to 0.64 mm. Of course, the pressure of this film is also very good, belonging to the first echelon
This rubber layer is really thick, it’s okay, but it is a film of iPhone. No screen is fingerprint, otherwise … I am still a little worried.
When I observed these films, I noticed a tip. Any protective layer of the film cooperation is the edge is also the arc, and there is a thickness, which is mostly true 3D. Some films even have a post-protective layer, but it is flat, mostly 2.5d.
Snoving, this brand has some years old, I checked my buying film history, IPHONE 6 years I have used its home film, and why didn’t you continue to buy, I remember it … this time I looked at it Sales high, I bought a test, I hope to regain confidence.
I have always liked the protective back of Snake Devils, and it is very judged. The glass thickness of the Flash Devil is 0.33mm, but the rubber layer is controlled, and there is no fine product. The film’s workmanship is compared, and the microphone has a black and 2.5D chamfer. The edge is also true 3D arc.
In the publicity of the flash, he also called himself to use the AGC glass, but the final test results and the difference are very different. It is indeed a big mistake, and the flash is easy to break the impression.
Divi First Wei
First Wei, did a lot of mobile phones, bought their home’s iPhone charging audio translation, service is very good, the middle is broken once, immediately changed. I also bought their spare battery shells, which seems to have been replaced once …, how do I suddenly feel this quality? However, their service is still very nice.
This time I bought the first weaving film, I noticed that the soft side film was tested, the so-called soft edior film was not made by glass molding, but combined with plastic materials and adhesive. Arc. This film has a characteristic that the arc is very good, but the consistency of the arc is poor, and the glass and arc connection are seams, beautiful views.
Although there is no special label, I speculate is a 0.2mm film, the overall thickness is 0.44mm, which is relatively thin. The test results are a bit flavoring, which may be the consistency problem of the membrane.
I have been touched for a long time, I bought their mobile phone bracket, this time I bought their film, I chose the full-screen film that they called the boundless, and truthfully told you that there is no black-sided full screen film. It is a small circle with a black side, all of which are this law.
The overall film is still ok, the workmanship is the medium, and the handset is also paying attention to the chamfer. These are the quality film needs attention. The overall price is not expensive, and the film artifact is also included. It is necessary to know that this full-screen film that does not have a black side requires excellent positioning to ensure that there is no black edge. It will leave the white edge. In order to prevent it, it is not good, and it is also included with a can. Ok, don’t you say good 10D, how can you have a white adhesive?
According to I observe, the film of the times should not be true 3d, belong to 2.5D category, strong pressure, large thickness, belonging to cost-effective!
Ranvoo Rui Dance
This brand is recommended to me, say good, let me test it together, the film usual standard price is not very suitable, which is medium or biased, and nearly 20 yuan a non-black-screen full-screen film is still very expensive.
All of the film of this brand is all in the rules, and the edge strength is generally general, and there is no real 3D arc side, and the handset position has also done a 2.5D chamfer. The coated hand is really good, and it belongs to the relatively smooth, and the oily pen ink is very smooth, so this is high.
Searched my shopping record, this brand I actually bought once, this time I experience again. The film of the machine musicite is 0.2mm thickness, the overall thickness of 0.44 mm is a film having a thinner thickness in this assessment.
Although the helmet of the cover is very mighty, although I know that the 0.2mm film will be relatively fragile, you are too fragile. More than 70 cows broke the achievements, it was a bit hard to get out, and the edge strength is also general. Although the price is not expensive, the overall work is more general, the position of the handset is not chamfered, although it is more thin, it is not recommended.
Like the first one, it is also a soft side film, similar shape, workmanship and thickness, I even doubt that they are different batchs from the same foundry …, the headphones are not chamfered, I personally don’t like it, affect the overall Hand feel.
I like the soft film, the price is more than 10 yuan, the film artifact design is not as good as the first bath, but the edge strength of the film is worse than the first batch.
When you measure the memory box, I have begun to make a little memory blurry, and I have a lot of detailed information to record a lot of detailed information. It is convenient to write the memories yourself. I purchased this time the 9D steel film of the memory box.
The film protective layer of the memory box is relatively high, and there is a simple film artifact. But it should not be able to get into the real 3D arc edge membrane, despite 9D, but I think the business is misunderstood about the understanding of the dimension.
In addition to the thickness, the edge is not a true arc. If you don’t have a mobile phone shell, there will be some cases, and other performances are good, and it is also a cost-effective film.
Tmall is a large number of membranes, the packaging is relatively simple, the workmanship is general, the parameters are in the rules.
It is also not a full screen film without a black side, so the film should pay attention. The overall performance of the membrane is in the past, and the feeling is also a level of nothing. Look at the face of the price, sometimes you can try it.
I have a little tangled, I don’t know how to evaluate him, the three-piece price is extremely high, and it is only more than 6 yuan. Although it is a 0.33mm film, the overall thickness control is good, about 0.54mm. . Although there is so special shortcomings.
If you want to say something disadvantage, the coating layer may not be as smooth as other brands, when erase oily note numbers, you need more to remove it.
Why do I say this film makes me hard to evaluate? Because although the overall hardness, work is going. The edge strength is also stronger in this test film, but it is broken, there is a semi-tempered glass feeling, I don’t know if it is my illusion …
This brand is a more brand I used to use it. I have never been carefully observed whether it is really 3D arc, because the box cover has been writing a hot craft, so I believe it.
However, this time, the 3D film of the concave arc is compared, I think that the ancient ancient membrane edge is basically no concave, which can be basically considered to be a 2.5D film. So in the last period of time, this cannot be bonded, there will be a lot of dust.
Despite this, this film has no obvious short board. Although the details are slightly weak, there is no metal near the 22.5D chamfer. However, the overall fitness is better, and the pressure resistance is also possible. It belongs to the product you can try.
At this point, all the brands have been tested, and they will test the film without a brand.
A brand is ultra-thin
In fact, there are some such films on Taobao, the price is not cheap, a 0.15mm probably price is about 30 or so. The main reason I bought this is that he is very frank, not boasted 3D, no boasts for 9h, and the way is also popular. Sure enough, the quality of the film is good, very thin and has no virtual standard.
The overall fitness of the film is good, it may be because of the thinness, the overall strength is very uniform, although the center is more than those thick films, but the edge is in the first echelon in all films, that is, although it is a film but edge Not easy to crush. Working is medium orientation, the position of the handset is also dealt with 2.5D, but there is no brand price but not low … maybe everything is because of thin.
Other miscellaneous film
Incidentally, a few prices are less than 5 yuan, these films don’t have to pursue 3D arcs, at least 2.5d. Overall can be passed, but the surface treatment is very general, with an oily marker, it is difficult to erase. If it is not for the price of 1-5 yuan, it is not recommended to purchase.
Finally, after the film was broken, it can enter the summary stage.
The next content is full of dry goods, don’t look at only a few picture data, each film takes more than 20 minutes to carefully test, and do not calculate the test stickers and touch test, thank you for your support.
Summary and chart
Central strength: The higher, the more the screen center can afford
Edge strength, the higher the edge, the less easy to smash
Comprehensive intensity score (with fractional correction for thin films)
Integrated score, comprehensive feeling, fitness, thin, workmanship, price, etc. 50%
So according to this table (the comprehensive score of the left side, the right side price), my conclusion is coming:
First echelon comprehensive price ratio
Green United, not, Xi Si, Bonar, Taobao is equipped with ultra-thin film.
If you don’t care about the film of the Green United, the Green United is definitely a good choice, more than 20 yuan, intensity and workmanship, and the real 3D arc, if you want thin feel, you can consider Taobao 0.1- The film of 0.15 is good, but it is necessary to be courage and luck. Although the film is expensive, the quality and strength is guaranteed. If you like peace of mind, choose them, and the thickness is better than the green link. Bernee’s film is extremely cheap, the comprehensive price is extremely high, but as I said in the foreman, I am a bit weird after break, I can buy it.
Second echelon price priority product:
Such as memory box, Kaguchi, ancient ancient ancient ancient, single price is not high, comprehensive performance is good, do not pursue the best, but if you can use it, these brands will not let you down.
The third echelon does not match the product:
Unfortunately, this flash is in this echelon, which may be batch reasons, and the film intensity of the flash demon is indeed unexpected, especially if it is a comparison of the AGC substrate. However, there is also a Bunshi, although the workmanship is first-class, but it is not very good for the important pressure of the tempered film, but I still have interest to use it, after all, the value is very high, hope The subsequent batch has improved pressure resistance.
The fourth echelon is not recommended:
Because of the cause of the surface coating, it will extremely affect the hand and anti-stainability. This film is enough to have enough strength, but it is not comfortable, if it is just pursuit of cheap, it is another story.
The comprehensive performance of the machine music hall is really not very good. If it is me, you can only recommend it.
Finally, the data table is completely uploaded, I hope to see it clearly.
The land is beginning to popularize knowledge, to buy membranes, choose test methods and instruments, and finally complete testing at the last night, almost two weeks. It is very hard to gain, and I also have a probably understanding and understanding of mobile phone steel film on the market, and also has a great reference to the future choice and purchase of tempered films.
I hope that everyone can recognize the misleading of merchants, avoiding the so-called 9D, 9H traps, and choose the right temperament of their own, is the biggest encouragement to me.