■
according to:
The higher the charging treasure rated capacity, the more the number of times charging the phone.
Recently, the Shenzhen Consumers Committee announced the results of radio charging treasure on 10 markets. Integrated charging protection, foreign matter detection, heat-refrigerant requirements, three test results show,
Samsung, Rome
The sample is well performed and a five-star.
Water drops, Kovo
The two wireless charge mobile power samples were not labeled in the claim, and the measured conversion efficiency did not reach 80%, and did not meet the standard requirements.
The hot wireless charging treasure brand on top of 10 markets is Samsung, Roman Shi, Momo, Jingdong, Zimi, Mai Duo, Xi Si, Netease Zhigang, Kobo, Water drops.
The test indicator mainly involves the label identifier (QI logo and authentication, product body identification, environmental identification), security (charging protection, foreign matter detection FOD, fever requirements), performance (wireless charge, charging time), charging treasure battery performance (effective Input capacity, wired conversion efficiency, free falling) and other four aspects.
Through comparative experiments,
performance
Aspect, Momor, Beijing Tokyo, Zimi, Rome, Mai Duo 5 samples
compatibility
Good, can achieve the maximum input power, of which
Mmmmith, Beijing Tokyo, purple rice
3 samples can be maximized three test phones.
also,
Charging time
Test results show,
Apple 12 mobile phone
The shortest charging time is: Netease Zhigang (2:32), Beijing Tokyo (2:51 points);
Huawei P40 Pro mobile phone
The shortest charging time is: Xi (2:13), Mai has a lot (2:17);
Xiaomi 11 mobile phone charging time
The shortest is: wheat, purple rice sample (2:12).
Battery performance
In terms of Rome, Samsung sample comprehensive performance is better for five-star. Three of the effective output capacity is Roma 6873mAh, Samsung 6586mAh, and Beijing Tokyo is 6541mAh. Third, three of the conversion efficiency is NetEase to be strictly selected 83.5%, Roman Shi 83.4%, and Mai has 83.19%.
It is worth noting that this test,
Safety test
Aspect, integrated charging protection, foreign matter detection FOD, heat-generating requirements three more important indicator test results show that Samsung, Roma Shi sample is better, and a five-star.
Label ID
Aspect, comprehensive QI logo, product body identification, environmental identification, etc., Samsung’s sample label identification is best, and the five-star.
Comprehensive test results, the Shenzhen Consumers Committee reminded that the rated capacity is the amount actually used by consumers.
The higher the rated capacity, the more the number of times the mobile phone is charged.
At the same time, special attention should be taken to avoid metal objects.
. Wireless charging is like a small “induction cooker”, when the power is turned on, the metal object is placed, which will allow the metal to heat up, resulting in damage to charging treasure or burns.
Water drops, Kovo
The two wireless charge mobile power samples were not labeled in the claim, and the measured conversion efficiency did not reach 80%, and did not meet the standard requirements.